The Tale of Creative Non-victims: A Study of Feminist Revisionist Mythology in Margaret Atwood's Unpopular Gals

Authors

  • Adrija Santra The University of Burdwan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56062/

Keywords:

Feminism, Mythology, Fairy tales, Victimhood, Margaret Atwood

Abstract

Myth is often considered as the soul of a particular culture, a perception that entails an unquestioning acceptance to all its discriminatory assumptions. One of the most prevailing features of mythology is its projection of a world predominated by patriarchal worldviews. Instances of misogyny, sexism, violence, commodification and dehumanization of women abound in the world of myths and fairy tales. Therefore, Contemporary feminist scholars feel compelled to re-evaluate the domains of myth, legend, folklore and fairy tale, seeking to expose the male hegemonic structures embedded beneath their apparently innocuous reading and to recover the female voices that have long been suppressed and marginalized. Margaret Atwood is one of the most prominent writers of the literary genre called "feminist revisionist mythology", which reinterprets the traditional narratives through a feminist lens. This paper offers a critical analysis to the short fiction "Unpopular Gals" from her 1992 collection Good Bones, focusing on Atwood's reconfiguration of female characters traditionally condemned as Cruel and villainous. It examines Atwood’s characterization through the framework of the victimhood model proposed in Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature. The study further argues that Atwood delineates these women not as passive victims or silent sufferers, but as creative non-victims who put up a strong resistance against the male oriented socio-cultural system. The paper engages the reader into a critical rethinking of the traditional mythological narratives, foregrounding the agency of the women who challenge and subvert patriarchal constructions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Adrija Santra, The University of Burdwan

    Adrija Santra is a junior scholar fellow pursuing her Ph.D from the department of English and Cultural Studies at The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India. Her areas of interest include Gender Studies, Mythology, Folklore Studies, Ecocriticism and Indian Literature.

     

     

References

Atwood, Margaret. Burning Questions:Essays and Occasional Pieces 2004-21. Chatto & Windus, 2021.

---. Good Bones. Virago, 2010.

---. “If You Can’t Say Something Nice, Don’t Say Anything At All.” Meanjin, Winter 1995.

http://meanjin.com.au/essays/if-you-cant-say-somethinh-nice-dont-say-anything-at-all/

---. Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature. House of Anansi Press, 2012.

Bacchilega, Cristina. Postmodern Fairy Tales: Gender and Narrative Strategies. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997.

Barzilai, Shuli. “Unfabulating a Fable, or Two Readings of “Thylacine Ragout”. ” Once upon a Time: Myth, Fairy Tales and Legends in Margaret Atwood’s Writings, edited by Sarah E. Appleton, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008, pp. 127-50.

Beauvoir, Simone de. The Second Sex. Translated and edited by H.M. Parshley, Everyman’s Library, 1993.

Beyer, Charlotte. “Feminist Revisionist Mythology and Female Identity in Margaret Atwood’s Recent Poetry.” Literature and Theology, vol. 14, no. 3, 2000, pp. 276-98. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23925612. Accessed on 21 Mar. 2026.

Carter, Angela. The Bloody Chamber. Penguin Books, 1979.

Duffy, Carol Ann. The World’s Wife. Picador Classics, 1999.

Gilbert, Sandra M., and Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and

the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. Yale University Press, 1979.

Grimm, Jacob, and Wilhelm Grimm. Grimm’s Fairy Tales. Fingerprint Classics, 2021.

Howells, Carol Ann. ““We can’t Help but Be Modern”: The Penelopiad.” Once upon a Time: Myth, Fairy Tales and Legends in Margaret Atwood’s Writings, edited by Sarah E Appleton, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2008, pp.57-72.

Kaminski, Margaret. “Preserving Mythologies.” Margaret Atwood: Conversations, edited by

Earl G. Ingersoll, Virago, 1992.

Malinowski, Bronislaw. “Myth in Primitive Psychology.” Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays, The Free Press: Glencoe, Illinois, 1948, pp. 122.

Millet, Kate. Sexual Politics. Doaba Publications, 2021.

Namjoshi, Suniti. Feminist Fables. Sheba Feminist Publishers, 1981.

Nischik, Reingard M. “Margaret Atwood’s Short Stories and Shorter Fictions.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood, edited by Carol Ann Howells, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 145-60.

Ostriker, Alicia. “The Thieves of Language: Women Poets sand Revisionist Mythmaking.” Stealing the Language: The Emergence of Women’s Poetry in America, Beacon Press, 1986.

Rowe, Karen E. “Feminism and Fairy Tales.” Don’t Bet on the Prince: Contemporary Feminist Fairy Tales in North America and England, edited by Jack Zipes, Routledge, 1987, pp. 209-26.

---. “To Spin the Yarn: The Female Voice in Folklore and Fairy Tale.” Fairy Tales and Society: Illusion, Allusion and Paradigm, edited by Ruth B. Bottigheimer, University of Pennsylvania Press,1986, pp. 53-74.

Sexton, Anne. Transformations. Houghton Mifflin Company, 1971.

Tolan, Fiona. “Margaret Atwood’s Revision of Classic Texts.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood, edited by Carol Ann Howells, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 109-23.

Weber, Brenda R. “The Incredible Invisible Woman: Age, Beauty, and the spectre of Identity.” The Routledge Companion to Beauty Politics, edited by Maxine Leeds Craig, Routledge, 2021.

Wilson, Sharon Rose. Margaret Atwood’s Fairy-Tale Sexual Politics. University Press of Mississippi, 1993.

---. “Mythological Intertexts in Margaret Atwood’s Works.” Margaret Atwood: Works and Impact, edited by Reingard Nishcik, Camden House, 2000, pp. 215-28.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25

How to Cite

Adrija Santra. “The Tale of Creative Non-Victims: A Study of Feminist Revisionist Mythology in Margaret Atwood’s Unpopular Gals”. Creative Saplings, vol. 5, no. 5, May 2026, pp. 27-42, https://doi.org/10.56062/.