Ecological Amnesia and the Path to Ecocide: Biotechnological Practices in Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56062/

Keywords:

Biotechnology, Ecological Amnesia, Ecocide, Transhumanism, Genetic Engineering, Biocapitalism, Oryx and Crake

Abstract

Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake predominantly represents transhumanist biotechnological practices through corporate laboratories to eradicate human limitations. Such Corporate biotechnological practices create ecological amnesia. This refers to the lack of ecological wisdom and awareness when creating artificial species in corporate laboratories. It ignores the interconnectedness of humans, animals, and plants to maintain a balanced ecosystem. Drawing on Rosi Braidotti’s critical posthumanism, N. Katherine Hayles’ notion of disembodied information, Techno-Humanism: Requiem for the Cyborg by Timothy Lenoir, and Isabelle Stengers’ slow science, the studies trace a causal pathway. Initially, Oryx and Crake presents engineered species such as Pigoons, ChickieNobs, and Crakers that lack evolutionary lineage, making them patentable and functional entities. This paper examines the consequences of ecological erasure on ecosystems, resulting to the fragile simulated environment. This ultimately leads to ecocide. To address the potential risks caused by corporate biotechnology. The research also analyses the 2025 IUCN synthetic biology policy, the Nagoya Protocol, and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Policy and proposes a normative ethical framework called ecological memory ethics. This paper not only predicts the possible warning of transhumanist biotechnology but also offers an ethical framework for maintaining long-term ecological accountability.

0 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atwood, Margaret. Oryx and Crake. Doubleday, 2003.

Braidotti, Rosi. “Posthuman Critical Theory.” Journal of Posthuman Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, 2017, pp. 9–25, rosibraidotti.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/369.-Posthuman-Critical-Theory-1.pdf.

– – –. The Posthuman. Polity Press, 2013.

Bostrom, Nick. “Why I Want to Be a Posthuman When I Grow Up.” Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity, edited by Bert Gordijn and Ruth Chadwick. Springer, 2008, pp. 107–37.

– – –. “A History of Transhumanist Thought.” Journal of Evolution and Technology, vol. 14, Apr. 2005, pp. 1-25, https://ln.run/C4ZBV. PDF download.

Bouson, J. Brooks. “‘It’s Game Over Forever’: Atwood’s Satiric Vision of a Bioengineered Posthuman Future in Oryx and Crake.” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, vol. 39, no. 3, Sept. 2004, pp. 139–56, https://doi.org/10.1177/002198940404705.

Butler, Judith. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? Verso, 2009.

Canavan, Gerry. “Hope, But Not for Us: Ecological Science Fiction and the End of the World in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood.” Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory, vol. 23, no. 2, 2012, pp. 138-59, https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2012.676914.

Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity. "Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity: 15/4. Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework." Fifteenth Meeting - Part II, Montreal, Canada, 7–19 Dec. 2022, United Nations Environment Programme, 19 Dec. 2022, CBD/COP/DEC/15/4.

Cooke, Grayson. “Technics and the Human at Zero-Hour: Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake.” Studies in Canadian Literature, vol. 30, no. 2, 2005, pp. 86-104.

Cooper, Melinda. Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. U of Washington P, 2008.

Dahal, Alisa. “The Posthuman Homo Faber in Atwood’s Oryx and Crake: An Ironic Port Royal.” Pursuits: A Journal of English Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, 2023, pp. 1-8, https://doi.org/10.3126/pursuits.v7i1.55369. PDF download.

Foucault, Michel. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76. Translated by David Macey, Picador, 2003.

Frew, Lee. “‘A Whole New Take on Indigenous’: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake as Wild Animal Story.” Studies in Canadian Literature / Études en littérature

Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. U of Chicago P, 1999.

Higgins, Polly, Damien Short, and Nigel South. “Protecting the Planet: A Proposal for a Law of Ecocide.” Crime, Law and Social Change, vol. 59, no. 3, 2013, pp. 251–266. Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-013-9413-6.

Howells, Coral Ann. “Margaret Atwood’s Dystopian Visions: The Handmaid’s Tale and Oryx and Crake.” The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood, edited by Coral Ann Howells. Cambridge UP, 2006, pp. 161-75, https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521839661.012.

International Chamber of Commerce. Digital Sequence Information and the Nagoya Protocol: Submission to the CBD. ICC Task Force on Access and Benefit Sharing, Sept. 2017.

International Union for Conservation of Nature. IUCN Policy on Synthetic Biology in Relation to Nature Conservation. IUCN World Conservation Congress, Oct. 2025, https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/WCC-8th-011-Enz. PDF.

Khalighi, Moein, et al. “Quantifying the Impact of Ecological Memory on the Dynamics of Interacting Communities.” PLOS Computational Biology, vol. 18, no. 6, 2022, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009396. PDF download.

Kozioł, Sławomir. “Crake’s Aesthetic: Genetically Modified Humans as a Form of Art in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, vol. 59, no. 4, 2018, pp. 492–508, https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2018.1432556.

Ku, Chung-Hao. "Of Monsters and Men: Transgenics and Transgression in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake." Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, vol. 32, no. 1, Jan. 2006, pp. 107-33.

Lenoir, Timothy. “Make-Believe: Simulation and Atrophy.” Anthropology of the Near Future, edited by Ross Priory, Stanford UP, 2004, pp. 290–320.

– – –. “Shaping Bio-Informatics: The Challenge of Preserving Meaning in a Changing Physical Substrate.” Writing Science, edited by Timothy Lenoir, Stanford UP, 1998, pp. 308-345.

– – –. “Techno-humanism: Requiem for the Cyborg.” Posthuman Bodies, edited by Judith Halberstam and Ira Livingston, Indiana UP, 1995, pp. 196-220.

Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis, Duquesne UP, 1969.

Bostrom, Nick. “Why I Want to Be a Posthuman When I Grow Up.” Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity, edited by Bert Gordijn and Ruth Chadwick. Springer, 2008, pp. 107–37.

Nixon, Rob. Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard UP, 2011.

Parry, Jovian. “Oryx and Crake and the New Nostalgia for Meat.” Society & Animals, vol. 17, no. 3, 2009, pp. 241-56, https://doi.org/10.1163/156853009X445406.

Roberge, Jonathan, and Michael Castelle. “What Kind of Learning Is Machine Learning?” The Cultural Life of Machine Learning: An Incursion into Critical AI Studies, edited by Jonathan Roberge and Michael Castelle. Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, pp. 79-116.

Roy, Swagata Singha. “Speculative Fiction, Biocapitalism and Being Tentacular: Reading the MaddAddam Trilogy as Posthuman Saga.” New Literaria, vol. 3, no. 1, 2022, pp. 106–19, https://dx.doi.org/10.48189/nl.2022.v03i1.012.

Schweiger, Andreas H., et al. “The Importance of Ecological Memory for Trophic Rewilding as an Ecosystem Restoration Approach.” Biological Reviews, vol. 93, no. 4, 2018, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12432. PDF download.

Sichelman, Ted M. Review of Improving Nature: The Science and Ethics of Genetic Engineering, by Michael Reiss and Roger Straughan. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, vol. 10, no. 3, 1997, pp. 707-13.

Stiegler, Bernard. The Lost Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Daniel Ross, Polity Press, 2014.

– – –. For a New Critique of Political Economy. Translated by Daniel Ross, Polity Press, 2010.

– – –. Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus. Translated by Richard Beardsworth and George Collins, Stanford UP, 1998.

Stengers, Isabelle. Another Science Is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science. Polity Press, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-25

How to Cite

Sudil Panta. “Ecological Amnesia and the Path to Ecocide: Biotechnological Practices in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake”. Creative Saplings, vol. 5, no. 10, Oct. 2026, pp. 48-70, https://doi.org/10.56062/.

Similar Articles

21-30 of 36

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.